by Michael G. Mickey
(12-7-09)

Sixty-eight years ago today, December 7, 1941, the attack on Pearl Harbor occurred which led to President Franklin Delano Roosevelt to later declare it "a date which will live in infamy." Fast forward to the present and we see the United Nations' summit on climate change is beginning today in Copenhagen, Denmark.

The Copenhagen summit on climate change is being billed as the 'Greatest show on Earth' by the EU Observer but, based on what we've learned recently in relation to scientists potentially altering data to indicate global warming is far more severe than is actually the case, calling Copehagen a "show" may be an understatement. If the data on climate change is bogus and the entire world is being deceived by a select few with a hidden agenda, what's currently taking place at Copenhagen is a high crime, a fraud of epic proportions.

The EU Observer is reporting the following, in part, on the opening of the show:

Some 15,000 delegates from 192 countries are descending on Copenhagen on Monday (7 December) for what many are describing as the biggest show on Earth, and, for scientists at least, the most important meeting the world has ever known: the UN summit on climate change.

The "most important meeting the world has ever known"? Really? Label me a skeptic based on recent information that has made it into the public realm, particularly information on a scandal being referred to as ClimateGate.

Many of you who read this may not have heard a great deal, if anything, on the topic of ClimateGate because the mainstream media, as is typical of many topics, is largely choosing to ignore its implications or even provide the public with the information uncovered for humanity's collective consideration. Combating the mainstream media's silence, the Media Research Center is trying its best to get the big players in news broadcasting to let the American people know about ClimateGate at the very least, going so far as to have couriers hand deliver 'reminders' to ABC, NBC and CBS to provide news coverage on the scandal alongside what will almost certainly be absurd levels of coverage of the Copenhagen event. To see how effective the MRC's efforts will be, watch any of those networks' evening news broadcasts tonight. My guess is you'll hear a lot of chatter about the devastating effects climate change is having on our planet, the international community's collective resolve to meet the crisis head on, and next to nothing (or pure nothing) on the fact the entire topic may be a scam.

What is ClimateGate?

On 11-24-09, Robert Tracinski of RealClearPolics wrote a commentary on the topic. The following are some excerpts of interest:

In early October, I covered a breaking story about evidence of corruption in the basic temperature records maintained by key scientific advocates of the theory of man-made global warming. Global warming "skeptics" had unearthed evidence that scientists at the Hadley Climatic Research Unit at Britain's University of East Anglia had cherry-picked data to manufacture a "hockey stick" graph showing a dramatic-but illusory-runaway warming trend in the late 20th century.

But now newer and much broader evidence has emerged that looks like it will break that scandal wide open. Pundits have already named it "Climategate."

After a brief explanation of how ClimateGate came to exist, Tracinski wrote of how the information made its way into the public realm precisely at the moment it needed to:

A hacker-or possibly a disillusioned insider-has gathered thousands of e-mails and data from the CRU [Climate research Unit] and made them available on the Web. Officials at the CRU have verified the breach of their system and acknowledged that the e-mails appear to be genuine.

Yes, this is a theft of data-but the purpose of the theft was to blow the whistle on a much bigger, more brazen crime. The CRU has already called in the police to investigate the hacker. But now someone needs to call in the cops to investigate the CRU.

Amen to that last sentence, but don't expect it to happen, in my humble opinion. In fact, as a retired police officer, I wish the very best of luck to any law enforcement agency willing to try and crack that case! Why do I say that? There are many powerful and influential people involved in pushing the global warming agenda. Add to that the fact a walloping 192 countries, whether intentionally participating in furthering what may be the largest scam ever or as a result of sheer deception, are legitimizing the global warming paranoia by sending thousands of diplomats to attend the Copenhagen event and you have an almost insurmountable plot to unravel. Even if it is proven beyond any doubt that the CRU 'cooked its books' to make global warming a crisis the newly-surfaced inside information indicates it isn't, too many powerful nations have invested too much to simply drop the subject. And the poor nations of the world? They stand to gain too much from Copenhagen to blow the whistle on any perceived scam even if they could. It's only the first day of the conference and already the European Union, for example, has pledged billions in aid to poor countries.

But back to Tracinski's article on ClimateGate. In it he notes that the recently-recovered e-mails implicating the CRU has engaged in deception in presenting inaccurate data on climate change to the world include "private admissions of doubt or scientific weakness in the global warming theory". He adds the following details of one such e-mail in support of that claim:

In acknowledging that global temperatures have actually declined for the past decade, one scientist asks, "where the heck is global warming?... The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can't."

Not only does Tracinski's article reveal there are scientists at the CRU who can't legitimately document what they are 'officially' saying is taking place, there is evidence that the staff of the CRU has been actively evading legal requests made under the Freedom of Information Act to prevent interested parties from seeing the data they publicly say they have supporting global warming.

What is the endgame?

If global warming isn't legitimately a global crisis, why do we have the Copenhagen summit underway, being hyped to the heavens? I have a strong theory based on what I've learned recently, albeit one a lot of people will be reluctant to accept as truth.

A long time ago, concerning the implementation of a global government, I hypothesized in written form that the Rapture of the Church could be an event of such scope it could draw all mankind together under a global government, global currency and, ultimately, a global leader. As I looked back on that commentary as I wrote this commentary, one of the issues I addressed in brief was the global economic crisis the Rapture could create, how it could push the world toward a common global currency. A review of the recent economic news of our world today reveals that we already have a global economic crisis afoot. Couple the economic crisis with a purported environmental crisis that endangers the entire planet and we have the underpinnings for influential powers in the world seeking to create a new world order to push us toward acceptance of one as necessary for all humanity's sake. But it's silly of me to suggest something like that, isn't it? Well no, but don't take my word for it.

As I've already documented, newly selected president of the European Union (the revived Roman empire of bible prophecy) Herman van Rompuy wrote the following recently:

We are living through exceptionally difficult times: the financial crisis and its dramatic impact on employment and budgets, the climate crisis which threatens our very survival. A period of anxiety, uncertainty and lack of confidence. Yet these problems can be overcome by common efforts in and between our countries. 2009 is also the first year of global governance, with the establishment of the G20 in the middle of the financial crisis. The climate conference in Copenhagen is another step towards the global management of our planet. Our mission is one of hope, supported by acts and action.

If you think you're hallucinating concerning what you just read, you're not. Copenhagen may be about a lot more than climate change to say the very least! Global warming may be a lie and a known lie by a number of elitists in the world, but, as they say in show business, "the show must go on" in this instance. Why? Because my suspicion is Copenhagen is exactly what Rompuy says it is - "another step" being taken by a select group of elitists who share one common goal - the implementation of a new world order, one that will ultimately be led by the prophesied Antichrist.

2nd Timothy 3:13 tells us the last days will see evil men and seducers waxing worse and worse, both deceiving and being deceived themselves. When I read that something as hyped as global warming has been in recent years may be nothing more than scientists cherry picking and altering data to document a global crisis that threatens the very survival of our planet and humanity when no such crisis exists, it isn't hard for me to believe that the Copenhagen summit of December 7, 2009 may mark another "date which will live in infamy", a day when the new world order became one step closer to becoming a reality.

Some will probably write to me and suggest I'm instilling fear in people that is unwarranted. I am, as always, prepared for that but if I were skeptical of Copenhagen being a smoke screen event, I'd take a long, hard look at the two things EU president Herman van Rompuy has openly stated marked the beginning of "global governance" in this calendar year of 2009 before I fired off a critique, the global financial crisis and the Copenhagen summit on climate change that began today.

What next?

---

12-8-09: Did I guess right when I said the mainstream media wouldn't cover ClimateGate seriously?

MSNBC: ClimateGate ‘A Controversy That’s Not Really There’

NY Times Public Editor Says ClimateGate Emails 'Not a Three-Alarm Story'

CNN's American Morning Leans Towards ClimateGate Deniers